Description
Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practice special forms of reasoning is false. (Description from external book data)
listed in Philosophy | 6 similar books linked from this page.
Offers
Currently unavailable
There are no swap offers for this book right now.
Only Offers/Searches from registered users with name will be displayed. Set up a name here to see your offers.
Rate/Setting
Please log in to rate or offer books. Log in
Offer this book
Log in to add your own offer, choose the format and describe delivery options.
More to discover
Find more books by this author, in this category or in the same language.